Contrast With Startling Information
Public speeches are always enhanced by starting out with startling facts or
statistics. Later in your speech, you can bring the audience’s attention
back to the speaker by inserting startling information. One way to include
startling statements in a speech is the use of contrast. Over the summer in
visiting Thailand, Cambodia, and Guam, I found several examples of startling
information.
There were 10,000,000 land mines in Cambodia at one time and a million
still remain. Tourists are warned not to stray off paths because of the danger
of land mines. The longest airline route is 18 hours and 40 minutes from Los
Angeles to Singapore. Guam has l63,000 people and l4,000 are government
employees, not counting Federal employees. A super typhoon in 2002 in Guam had
winds up to 245 miles per hour and caused much destruction. The largest
university in the world is Ramkhanhaeng in Bangkok. It has over 300,000
students. Let’s look at how we might use some of these items in speeches.
For example, in talking about the danger of not following hiking trails in
a given location, you might begin with the million land mines in Cambodia and
then say, "We don’t have to worry about land mines in the Smoky
Mountains, but you can easily get lost or run into a bear if you stray off the
designated trails." Or if you were talking about how to handle boredom on
cross country flights, you could mention the over l8 hour flight to Singapore
and then say, "Fortunately it is only a four-hour flight to Phoenix, but
some of these points still apply." If you are discussing the growth of a
particular university you could mention the 300,000 statistic and then say,
"Northern Kentucky University will never be that size, but growing from
2,200 students in 1972 to well over l6,000 in 2004 says a lot about its impact
in the Commonwealth of Kentucky."
Combining contrasts with startling information is a powerful way to help
people remember an important point or regain the attention of the audience. In
researching for a speech, continually be on the lookout for startling
information.
Return to top
When NOT to Tell Your Own Story
In public speaking one of the ways to be successful is to learn to tell
your own story. In interpersonal communication, however, you will be seen as
an excellent conversationalist if you resist telling your own story! Instead,
let the other person tell his or her story and then find out more about the
person in the story by asking questions and affirming his or her narrative.
When someone tells us a story in conversation, it is human nature that we
can’t wait until he or she finishes to tell our own story and usually it is
a bigger and more dramatic story than the other person. We in essence say,
"You think that story is significant, but mine is better!" That is
not the way to earn respect and rapport with the other person. Instead, when a
person relates a personal experience to you, resist the temptation to tell
your own "more significant" story and instead listen carefully, nod
your head, and include an appropriate "wow," or "That had to be
difficult." Then when the person pauses, instead of launching into your
own story, ask a follow up question. "How did you feel when that
happened?" or "What happened after that?"
No matter how desperately you want to tell your story, if you shift the
center of attention to you, the other person will feel slighted. You will have
lost some sense of connectedness with the other person no matter how great
your story is.
By resisting the urge to tell your own story in response to the other
person’s story, you will be seen as a good listener and one who is really
interested in people. It is my experience in watching people that this habit
is one of the most difficult to master and one which will immediately put you
in the upper ranks of people who communicate well one-on-one.
Learning to talk less and listen more in conversation, not telling your own
story, and encouraging the person to elaborate on his or her story will make
you be seen as a pleasant and desirable conversationalist.